Why any people at all of any political affiliation still believe in this oil nonsense is beyond me. Iraq was invaded mostly for personal reasons - finish off your father's arch nemesis, get some great contractor work for your chum's companies as a bonus.Now that a major oil field was discovered near angola?
Lets examine your veiw of world events, we are at war because Bush wants oil? Hmmm, after 7 years as the president and Bush does not have a single drop of oil. Guess he just has to try harder. You're such a retard, and a political bigot.
New oil fields come online all over the world on a regular basis.
But it is easy to to whip up a frenzy.
This is yet another STUPID question. First off, Bush isn't in Iraq for oil. I just still cannot believe people are saying this. If he really wanted oil, he would of invaded Saudi Arabia. The have a hell of alot more oil then the Iraqis, and it would be easier to take over.
So my answer is no. Maybe he would if there was a power hungry dictator hell bent on slaughtering people and trying to get his hands on WMA's to destroy the west. Yep then we would probably go in. The problem with liberals like you is that you over think everything a little bit too much. If someone said they were going to attack you and then said they had the means, you wouldn't go in and show them not to threaten you?
Well the Angolans will go back to civil war again so no need for Bush to intervene. Their government will be just as corrupt as the Nigerian one and the oil will not benefit the ordinary citizens of Angola. Its a shame but these will be the facts.
I expect a private race to ensue titling rights to the natural resource. Greed will decide the fate of individuals around it and,
I'm sure that America will want a hand in, stock at minimum if possible.
The same time Al Gore attacks Brazil for the renewable energy of sugar cane.
Uhhh, WHAT?! Bush is not as war hungry or oil hungry as you all seem to think.
No comments:
Post a Comment